Upon taking this sort of task on, one might think the idea of archiving all the interactions amongst users, especially on a social networking site, to be a daunting, if not impossible task. But is it really any different than trying to archive the interactions between people elsewhere? Just because these sites see a greater degree of traffic than others, and certainly more interaction, does that really make it less likely for us as analysts to archive the goings on between people? I think not.
In fact, the mere nature of the social media networks, such as Facebook or Twitter, make it easier than it would be otherwise to monitor the interactions between people and the "bits of content," as Foot describes them. As an example, let's look at a typical Twitter post:
In Foot's study of 9-11, he found that personal sites were the most allowing of expression of both types. If we were to do a similar study, using the Boston Marathon Bombing, and including Social Networking sites, I anticipate that the primary location of either type of expression would shift to networking locations, specifically Facebook and Twitter. These types of sites have somewhat replaced personal sites for uses of expressing one's opinion. Why take the time to create and author a blog about your opinion when you can reach a wider audience with ease on a social media site?
No comments:
Post a Comment